Authors
Jean C Yi, Sheri Ballard, Emily Jo Artim, Casey Walsh, K Scott Baker
Published in
Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice. Sep 18, 2026. Epub Sep 18, 2026.
Abstract
The National Standards for Cancer Survivorship Care propose health system policies to develop survivorship programs. Little is known about the utilization, barriers, and facilitators of survivorship care amongst adolescent and young adult (AYA: ages 15-39 at diagnosis) cancer survivors.
Participants included AYAs who were 1-5 years post-treatment and eligible to participate in a parent study testing a digital health intervention. The electronic health record (EHR) was queried to determine who had been seen in the Survivorship Clinic, and qualitative interviews were conducted with a randomly selected subset of those participants.
Of 836 survivors eligible for the parent trial, only 38 (4.5%) were seen in the Survivorship Clinic (86.8% female, 71.1% White, 86.8% not Hispanic, 65.7% breast cancer). A subset enrolled in the parent trial (n = 147) was screened for approach for qualitative interviews. Forty interviews were completed (mean age = 38.4 (SD = 4.4), 50% breast cancer, 78% female, 83% White, 83% Non-Hispanic White, 92% college or more education) with only one seen in the Survivorship Clinic. Participants identified barriers including lack of awareness, avoidance, and lack of time. Referrals from care teams, information about services provided, and telehealth were identified as factors that would have facilitated them seeking survivorship care.
Few AYAs sought survivorship services that could assist them in addressing the late effects of their cancer diagnosis and treatment.
Lack of awareness of the survivorship clinic was the most significant barrier, and a referral from their oncology care team would have facilitated them scheduling a visit.
PMID:
42760475
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 19 Sep 2026.
Read full publication at:
Please sign in
to see all details.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 4
- Comments 0