Bone Marrow Aspirate Augmentation Reduces Reoperation Rates After Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Knee: A Systematic Review.

Authors

Napatpong Thamrongskulsiri, Jacob T Morgan, Felipe Casanova, Logan D Moews, Adam B Yanke, Brian J Cole, Jorge Chahla

Published in

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association. Sep 20, 2026. Epub Sep 20, 2026.

Abstract

To systematically review the clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes of osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation with versus without bone marrow aspirate (BMA) augmentation for the treatment of knee cartilage defects.
A comprehensive search was performed according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Comparative clinical studies assessing OCA with and without BMA were included. Two reviewers independently performed screening, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 for randomized trials and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies for nonrandomized studies.
Four studies (3 Level III, 1 Level I) involving 165 knees met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up duration across studies ranged from 5.5 to 18.0 months. Across 2 comparative studies, BMA augmentation was associated with fewer reoperations (2.4% vs 21.9%) compared with non-BMA augmentation. Radiographic findings were heterogeneous: 1 study showed earlier integration and reduced sclerosis with BMA at 6 months, whereas 2 magnetic resonance imaging-based studies showed no differences in OCA Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System scores. Computed tomography assessment in 1 trial found increased small cysts but a trend toward fewer large cysts in BMA-treated grafts. Patient-reported outcomes from 1 study showed no significant differences in International Knee Documentation Committee or Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement scores between groups, although achievement of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement minimal clinically important difference favored the BMA cohort (88% vs 55%; P = .076).
OCA transplantation augmented with BMA is associated with significantly lower reoperation rates compared with nonaugmented transplantation. Although short-term radiographic data show improved early subchondral remodeling, these findings are not consistently corroborated by magnetic resonance imaging-based scores.
Level III, systematic review of Level I and III studies.

PMID:
42763432
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.