Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Personalized Brain Stimulation based on Brain Oscillations: A Systematic Review of MEG- and EEG-informed Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS).

Created on 21 Sep 2026

Authors

Shermin Sharifzadeh, Ali Fathi Jouzdani, Afra Souki, Andre R Brunoni, Danilo Benette Marques, Mohsen Ebrahimi, Peyman Ghobadi-Azbari, Aref Pariz, Ghazaleh Soleimani, Fatemeh Yavari, Reza Khosrowabadi, Ines R Violante, Hamed Ekhtiari

Published in

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. Pages 106991. Sep 20, 2026. Epub Sep 20, 2026.

Abstract

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) provides promising evidence as a technology to modulate brain oscillations. Individualized brain oscillation measures from magnetoencephalography (MEG) or electroencephalography (EEG) (M/EEG) can optimize frequency, location (montage), and timing of tACS. This systematic review aims to comprehensively characterize the parameter space and outcomes of M/EEG-informed personalized tACS interventions.
We conducted a systematic review of the literature up to January 2024, per PRISMA guidelines. The pre-registered search strategy combined terms related to M/EEG and tACS. Any study that utilized M/EEG-informed individualized tACS intervention was included, and relevant variables were extracted.
Seventy-eight publications comprising 143 distinct experiments were identified, including 128 EEG-informed and 15 MEG-informed studies. Frequency-based individualization was predominant (93%), followed by timing-based (4.2%; stimulation onset or phase) and montage-based (2.8%) methods. The most frequently individualized frequency band was alpha (69.2%), followed by theta (15.4%), gamma (5.6%), beta (4.9%), delta (2.1%), and dual-frequency protocols (2.8%). Outcome measures most commonly assessed physiological changes (28.7%) and cognitive functions, particularly perception (18.9%) and memory and learning (17.5%). 77.9% of sham-controlled experiments reported significant positive outcomes, compared to 56.2% of those with active control.
Over the past decade, personalized M/EEG informed tACS trials provide growing evidence for effectiveness of this technology in engaging brain oscillations. This systematic review highlights key methodological parameter space in this technology and its outcomes. It also provides a roadmap for future trials with rigorous active control arms to optimize engaging brain oscillations and impacting cognitive functions and clinical outcomes.

PMID:
42764046
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 21 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 23
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement