Robust model comparison and tests of interactions in phylogenetic path analysis: Revisiting "Why are telomeres the length they are?" (Benson et al. 2025).

Authors

Alejandro Gonzalez-Voyer, Iker Bargas-Galarraga, Achaz von Hardenberg

Published in

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution. Sep 21, 2026. Epub Sep 21, 2026.

Abstract

We discuss robust model comparison in phylogenetic path analysis and how to incorporate interactions in path analysis with d-separation. We revisit a study by Benson et al. (2025) to highlight the importance of carefully evaluating the causal models being compared to avoid erroneous conclusions. Our results show that there are biologically plausible models, not previously considered, that outperform those in the original study leading to quite different biological conclusions. We also use this work to demonstrate, using empirical data, how interactions can be incorporated in path analyses, and highlight how their presence affects the conditional independencies that must be tested for the model to be considered a plausible causal model. Our commentary highlights the importance of rigorously evaluating model space and verifying both the implied conditional independencies as well as the robustness of the assumed causal effects.

PMID:
42765951
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 21 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.