Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Designing ethical AI literacy across secondary to graduate STEM pathways: ensuring cross-disciplinary outcomes and workforce alignment.

Created on 21 Sep 2026

Authors

Taylor Lightner, Malle Schilling, Whitney Hansberry, Sakib Hussen, Abdul Siam, Verónica A Segarra

Published in

Journal of microbiology & biology education. Pages e0035125. Sep 21, 2026. Epub Sep 21, 2026.

Abstract

Rapid adoption of generative AI in STEM courses has created an urgent need for practical, ethical AI literacy that students can carry from high school into college and beyond. In this Perspective, we make the case for a cross-disciplinary approach to AI literacy and present a skills progression table that aligns core outcomes with typical academic and professional levels (high school, early undergraduate, advanced undergraduate, graduate, and workplace). We focus on six core areas: (i) attribution and citation, (ii) bias awareness and mitigation, (iii) privacy and data handling, (iv) safety and environmental care, (v) community impact and fairness, and (vi) compliance and readiness for audit. We frame AI-related classroom practice as a balancing act, on one side, clear benefits (faster drafting, coding support, and broader access), and on the other, real risks (bias, privacy leaks, over-reliance, and academic integrity concerns). To ground our Perspective in STEM broadly, we offer guidance with suggested steps and actions, grading cues, rural/low-bandwidth adaptations, and links to workforce expectations. We also note concrete examples from biology, engineering, and computer science to show both shared core practices and discipline-specific needs. As we look into the future, we highlight the role of professional societies as conveners to ensure alignment of guidance across disciplines and keep materials current. Our goal is to provide instructors with practical materials they can adopt, while building a living framework that evolves with evidence, standards, and stakeholder input.

PMID:
42765700
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 21 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 36
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement