Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Cancer Stem Cell Quiescence: Molecular and Microenvironmental Evidence for an Actively Regulated Adaptive Survival Strategy.

Created on 22 Sep 2026

Authors

Yasin Ahmadi, Trefa M Abdullah, Sakhavat Abolhasani, Amin Jalizi

Published in

Cancer medicine. Volume 15. Issue 9. Pages e72301.

Abstract

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a therapy-refractory subpopulation that drives tumor persistence, recurrence, and metastasis. A defining characteristic of CSCs is their ability to reversibly exit the cell cycle and enter a quiescent state, thereby escaping cytotoxic therapies that primarily target proliferating cells. Although numerous reviews have examined CSC dormancy and quiescence, less attention has been devoted to recently identified regulators and to the molecular events associated with the transition into quiescence. This narrative review consolidates current knowledge on CSC-specific entry regulators, including the pRb/RBL2-E2F1/4-GCN5 axis, Fbxw7-c-Myc pathway, PML-PPARδ-FAO axis, ID1/ID3-p21 network, JARID1B-mediated G0-like states, CDH1-SIRT5-Cyclin F axis, and AP-1/ETS network, alongside emerging evidence on epigenetic regulation, circadian influences, and immune-mediated signals. We critically evaluate the exhaustion hypothesis, delineate a therapeutic framework that distinguishes between prevention of quiescence entry, elimination of dormant CSCs, and forced reactivation, and identify key knowledge gaps. By integrating recent advances within a structured perspective, this review provides a framework for understanding how CSCs exploit quiescence for survival and therapy resistance and informs strategies to target this resilient population.

PMID:
42768738
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 22 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement