Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Risk of Tuberculosis in Type 2 Diabetes.

Created on 22 Sep 2026

Authors

Kuang-Ming Liao, Jheng-Yan Wu, Chih-Cheng Lai

Published in

Nature communications. Volume 17. Issue 1. Aug 22, 2026. Epub Aug 22, 2026.

Abstract

Tuberculosis remains a leading cause of illness and death worldwide, and individuals with type 2 diabetes have an increased risk of developing this infection. However, whether different glucose-lowering medications influence this risk is unclear. Here we show that use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists is associated with a lower risk of tuberculosis compared with several commonly prescribed alternatives. We conducted a multicenter cohort study using TriNetX electronic health records from 143 healthcare organizations across multiple countries between 2017-2025. Patients receiving glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists were compared with those receiving sulfonylureas, metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. Propensity score matching and time-to-event analyses were applied over up to 5 years of follow-up. Use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists is consistently associated with reduced tuberculosis risk compared with other agents. Incidence rates per 1,000 person-years ae lower than with sulfonylureas (0.68 vs 1.67; hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.59), metformin (0.65 vs 1.31; 0.60, 0.51-0.70), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (0.73 vs 1.71; 0.49, 0.43-0.56) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (0.89 vs 1.02; 0.82, 0.72-0.92). These findings suggest that this class of medications may provide additional protection against tuberculosis in patients with type 2 diabetes.

PMID:
42768061
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 22 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement