Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

The clinical benefit of routine PET/CT imaging in asymptomatic head and neck squamous cell cancer patients one year post-treatment.

Created on 23 Sep 2026

Authors

Eero Kytö, Matti Karjalainen, Saara Markkanen, Tero Vahlberg, Lassi Raittinen, Rami Taulu, Jussi Hirvonen, Saana Isler, Jussi Laranne, Heikki Irjala, Elina Halme

Published in

Acta oto-laryngologica. Pages 1-8. Sep 23, 2026. Epub Sep 23, 2026.

Abstract

The incidence of head and neck cancer is increasing, creating a growing need for follow-up strategies. The benefit of routine PET imaging beyond six months after treatment in asymptomatic patients remains unclear.
To assess whether routine PET/CT or PET/MRI imaging one year after treatment improves survival in asymptomatic patients with HNSCC.
In this retrospective real-world cohort study, 590 asymptomatic HNSCC patients treated between 2010 and 2015 were included. All had achieved complete metabolic response on PET imaging 3-4 months after primary treatment. Patients underwent either routine PET imaging at one year (n=241) or no routine imaging (n=349). Primary endpoints were 5-year overall survival(OS) and disease-free survival(DFS).
Routine imaging detected recurrence in 14 patients (5.8%). Eight of these were eligible for curative treatment, with a 2-year OS of 38%. However, routine PET imaging was not associated with improved 5-year OS (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.50-1.05) or DFS (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.68-1.43). No stage- or site-specific subgroup demonstrated a significant survival benefit.
Although routine PET imaging identified some asymptomatic recurrences amenable to curative treatment, it did not improve long-term survival, questioning its value in routine follow-up of asymptomatic HNSCC patients.

PMID:
42773936
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 23 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 19
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement