Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Reproductive factors and the expression of stromal markers in benign breast biopsy samples.

Created on 23 Sep 2026

Authors

Maisey Ratcliffe, Yujing J Heng, Yaileen D Guzman-Arocho, Bernard Rosner, Rulla M Tamimi, Lusine Yaghjyan

Published in

British journal of cancer. Sep 22, 2026. Epub Sep 22, 2026.

Abstract

We examined the associations of several reproductive factors with expression of stromal fibroblast markers αSMA, TNC, FAP, S100A6, and MMP14.
We included 694 cancer-free women with biopsy-confirmed incident benign breast disease within the Nurses' Health Study II. Breast cancer risk factor data were obtained from biennial questionnaires. Immunofluorescence of stromal markers was completed on tissue microarrays. For each core, % positivity was quantified with inForm v2.6.0. Generalized linear regression was used to examine the associations of reproductive factors with log-transformed positivity for each marker.
In multivariate analysis, nulliparous status showed a suggestive positive association with TNC expression (β = 0.79, 95% CI -0.10, 1.68, p = 0.08) but was not associated with the other stromal markers (all p > 0.10). No associations were seen for number of children, age at 1st birth, breastfeeding, continuous age at menarche, time between menarche and age at first birth, and time since last birth with any of the markers' expression. Categorical age at menarche showed a suggestive positive association with MMP14 (p-trend = 0.07).
Our findings suggest that nulliparous status and age at menarche may be associated with the expression of stromal fibroblast activation markers TNC and MMP14, respectively. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

PMID:
42773217
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 23 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement