Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Risk Factors for Bladder Diverticula in Patients with Benign Prostatic Enlargement: A Retrospective Study.

Created on 23 Sep 2026

Authors

You Zhao, Weiping Luo, Zhenyu Hang

Published in

Urology journal. Volume 23. Issue 4. Pages 172-177. Sep 20, 2026. Epub Sep 20, 2026.

Abstract

Currently, the risk factors for bladder diverticula in patients with benign prostatic enlargement remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to identify independent risk factors and provide a clinical reference for early risk screening of this complication.
A total of 310 patients diagnosed with benign prostatic enlargement between January 2021 and December 2024 were included in this retrospective study. General clinical data and relevant clinical indicators were collected, and risk factors were identified through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.
Among the 310 patients with benign prostatic enlargement, 21 had bladder diverticula, representing an incidence of 6.77%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that total prostate volume (odds ratio [OR] = 1.067, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.023-1.113, P = .002) and intravesical prostatic protrusion (OR = 1.135, 95% CI: 1.056-1.219, P < .001) were independent risk factors for bladder diverticula in patients with benign prostatic enlargement.
Bladder diverticula occurred in 6.77% of patients with benign prostatic enlargement in this cohort. Total prostate volume and intravesical prostatic protrusion are independent risk factors for this complication and may serve as clinical markers for risk evaluation.

PMID:
42773771
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 23 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement