Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Towards a Compositional Framework for Describing Human Phenotypes.

Created on 23 Sep 2026

Authors

Wanting Hu, Yunchao Ling, Xinyue Hu, Wei Chen, Rong Zhou, Xinhao Zhuang, Yanfeng Jiang, Jialu Zhao, Xingdong Chen, Jingchun Luo, Li Jin, Guoqing Zhang

Published in

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany). Pages e77730. Sep 22, 2026. Epub Sep 22, 2026.

Abstract

Deep phenotyping increasingly spans scales from macro to micro, yet heterogeneity in measurement and documentation still constrains standardization and limits comparability across cohorts. This study introduces a compositional framework that integrates the Phenotype Assembly Method (PhenoAM), Phenome Data Elements (PhenoDE), and a suite of large language model (LLM)-based PhenoAgents to support systematic, interpretable, and scalable phenotype standardization with quality assessment. PhenoAM decomposes phenotype descriptions into features and qualifiers to enable component-level mapping, while PhenoDE provides standardized representations of 58 371 phenotype data elements across 22 measurement platforms of the International Human Phenome Project (IHPP); pooled mapping coverage was 98.1% within the 18-platform analysis set and 99.8% across all 22 platforms. Using this representation, analyses of illustrative phenotypes from IHPP, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), and the UK Biobank show that differences in features or qualifiers can influence data distributions and analytic outcomes, underscoring the importance of explicit measurement context in cross-cohort studies. PhenoAgents support semantic parsing, terminology candidate retrieval, and data-quality review through curator-assisted modules. PhenoDEs and their statistical distributions within IHPP are accessible on the PhenoDE Portal.

PMID:
42773640
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 23 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement