Authors
Khayriyyah Mohd Hanafiah
Published in
Journal of microbiology & biology education. Pages e0017826. Sep 23, 2026. Epub Sep 23, 2026.
Abstract
Critical thinking and persuasive communication are essential for biology graduates navigating socioscientific dilemmas. While debate pedagogy fosters problem-solving, autonomy, competence, and relatedness aligned with adult learning and self-determination theories, inexperienced students often struggle with the cognitive load and anxiety from this format. To bridge this gap, "Dr. Contrarian," a persona-based conversational AI agent, was developed to function as an adversarial coach during debate preparation. Survey data (n = 21) adapted from the Technology Acceptance Model show that 85.7% of students found the tool easy to use, and 71.4% would use it again. Thematic analysis of metacognitive reflections suggests that while Dr. Contrarian facilitated meaningful cognitive engagement, spontaneous live rebuttals remain challenging for most students. Ultimately, by serving as a low-stakes ideological sandbox, this instructor-designed AI tool overcomes pedagogical barriers faced by novice debaters, allowing students to fully engage in and benefit from classroom debates.
PMID:
42775883
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 23 Sep 2026.
Read full publication at:
Please sign in
to see all details.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 14
- Comments 0