Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Temporal N-glycoproteomic differences between COVID-19 survivors and non-survivors at hospital admission and beyond.

Created on 23 Sep 2026

Authors

Xue Yu, Kelly Dingess, Rita Pavasini, Gianluca Campo, Spadaro Savino, Albert J R Heck, Karli R Reiding

Published in

Glycobiology. Sep 23, 2026. Epub Sep 23, 2026.

Abstract

COVID-19 has proven to have a wide range of symptoms in human patients, prompting investigation into relevant biomarkers and underlying biological mechanisms. In this study, we aimed to develop a robust quantitative N-glycoproteomics approach for complex plasma samples and to characterize the altered glycosylation profiles associated with COVID-19 severity. We analyzed plasma samples from 16 survivors and 15 non-survivors, collected at three distinct time points following hospital admission. Using data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mass spectrometry, combined with a spectral library and the "match-between-runs" strategy, we profiled 397 unique glycopeptides and 62 glycan species, derived from 50 proteins across 86 glycosylation sites. By assessing both cross-sectional differences and longitudinal changes, we identified several site-specific glycosylation alterations that may serve as potential markers of disease severity. The most notable site-specific change was in the complement C1q A-chain (C1QA) at Asn146, with non-survivors having less fucosylation at hospital admission. We also observed increased bisection of immunoglobulins in non-survivors (IgG3/4 Asn177 and IgM Asn146) and glycosylation pattern changes in acute-phase proteins. Longitudinally, the fucosylation levels of C1QA increased in the non-survivors, whereas they decreased in the survivors. These findings highlight the potential value of site-specific glycoproteomic profiling for improving the molecular understanding of COVID-19 severity.

PMID:
42775855
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 23 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement