Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Real-world utility of plasma GFAP and NfL in early-onset AD and FTD.

Created on 23 Sep 2026

Authors

Pratishtha Chatterjee, Svetlana Ivanic, Adam Southon, Claire McCarthy, Sheila K Patel, Maja Christensen, David Darby, Ashley I Bush, Scott Ayton, Michelle M Mielke, Emilio Werden, Amy Brodtmann

Published in

Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). Volume 18. Issue 3. Pages e70490. Epub Sep 21, 2026.

Abstract

Plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light chain (NfL) are promising blood biomarkers, but their real-world diagnostic utility in early-onset dementia is understudied.
Plasma GFAP, NfL, and phosphorylated tau (p-tau)217 were measured using Simoa in 118 patients with cognitive complaints, clinically classified as non-neurodegenerative conditions (non-ND; n = 52), early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD; n = 39), frontotemporal dementia (FTD; n = 20), or other-neurodegenerative dementia (ND)/ dementia (n = 7). P-tau217 defined Alzheimer's disease pathology.
GFAP was elevated in EOAD compared to non-ND, FTD, and other-ND, and distinguished EOAD from non-ND (area under the curve [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.924 [0.871-0.977]) but performed poorly for FTD versus non-ND (0.636 [0.496-0.775]). NfL was most elevated in FTD and EOAD, distinguishing both (FTD: 0.869 [0.778-0.961]; EOAD: 0.770 [0.673-0.867]) from non-ND, but less effective for FTD versus EOAD (0.750 [0.597-0.903]). GFAP appeared stable in severe renal impairment, while NfL increased.
These findings support integrating GFAP and NfL into clinical dementia assessments, with GFAP offering added diagnostic specificity in cases of severe renal impairment; however, validation in larger cohorts is needed.

PMID:
42774284
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 23 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 19
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement