Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

How do intragroup processes shape the quality of peer support for stroke survivors? A qualitative interview study.

Created on 24 Sep 2026

Authors

Laura Hollands, Raff Calitri, Catherine Haslam, Mark Tarrant

Published in

Neuropsychological rehabilitation. Pages 1-27. Sep 23, 2026. Epub Sep 23, 2026.

Abstract

Stroke support groups have been shown to help survivors recover and cope with the socioemotional sequalae of stroke. Social group processes supporting connectedness and engagement are key to the beneficial effects of these groups, but less is known about how they are operationalized in stroke support groups. This study explores participant experiences of stroke support groups and how group processes enable the benefits of participation to be realized. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via Zoom with 12 stroke survivors - including people with aphasia - and two carers, who attended hybrid delivery or online support groups. Thematic analysis was used to develop themes from the data. Three themes and four sub-themes were constructed, (1) recovering together, (2) meaningful participation, with subthemes "leaders as enablers of meaningful participation," and "anticipating each other's needs," and (3) a place for belonging, with subthemes "developing connection through and beyond stroke identity" and "creating the conditions for belonging through commitment." Findings are used to inform recommendations to support group leaders to facilitate connectedness and engagement amongst group members. Future research should explore how to overcome the barriers that impede group processes in online groups in order to optimize their potential.

PMID:
42777189
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 24 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 12
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement