Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Visuospatial recall vulnerability in former contact-sport athletes with persistent post-concussion symptoms: Limited correspondence with structural brain age.

Created on 24 Sep 2026

Authors

Camille Charlebois-Plante, Samuel Guay, Sophie-Andrée Vinet, Jeanne Bellerose, Marie-Ève Bourassa, Louis De Beaumont

Published in

Applied neuropsychology. Adult. Pages 1-11. Sep 23, 2026. Epub Sep 23, 2026.

Abstract

A minority of individuals develop persistent post-concussion symptoms (PCS) after sport-related concussion, including lasting cognitive difficulties. We previously reported an elevated brain age gap (BAG) in former contact-sport athletes with PCS, but such a marker is clinically useful only if it relates to their cognitive difficulties. We examined episodic memory in former athletes with (PCS+) and without (PCS-) PCS, and tested whether the BAG-memory relationship differed by symptomatic status. Fifty former contact-sport athletes (24 PCS+, 26 PCS-) contributed MRI and cognitive data; 21 non-concussed control athletes completed the cognitive assessment only. Verbal and visuospatial memory were compared across groups. PCS+ athletes showed lower immediate and delayed recall on the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (RCFT), reflecting a significant Group x Process interaction (F(4,128) = 6.74, p < .001, η2p = .17) that persisted with education covaried and was unrelated to depressive or anxiety symptoms. Groups did not differ on recognition or verbal memory, indicating a difference specific to visuospatial recall. The BAG-memory relationship did not differ by symptomatic status, and within-group associations were small and did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. A sensitive, process-level measure such as the RCFT captured a memory difference that structural brain age did not reflect.

PMID:
42776923
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 24 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 17
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement