Deep Learning-Assisted Classification of Urinary Red Blood Cell Morphology for Glomerular Hematuria Screening: A Pilot Study.

Authors

Yih-Lon Lin, Jung-Sheng Chen, Ya-Fan Chuang, Siang-Ru Huang, Chien-Sen Liao

Published in

Journal of clinical laboratory analysis. Pages e70356. Sep 23, 2026. Epub Sep 23, 2026.

Abstract

Distinguishing glomerular from non-glomerular hematuria remains challenging because urinary dysmorphic red blood cells (RBCs) are morphologically heterogeneous and affected by preanalytical and physicochemical factors. This pilot study developed a deep learning-assisted system for urinary RBC morphology classification and evaluated its feasibility for expert-guided glomerular hematuria screening support.
We retrospectively analyzed 491 high-resolution urine sediment images containing 15,779 annotated RBCs or RBC-like objects from a regional teaching hospital. RBCs were labeled as isomorphic, dysmorphic, or unknown according to established morphological criteria. A YOLOv5l model was trained for RBC detection and classification. Model outputs were integrated with an operational dysmorphic RBC-based scoring system and compared with manual expert assessment.
The model achieved a precision of 0.84, recall of 0.69, and F1-score of 0.76 for dysmorphic RBC classification, with a recall of 0.98 for isomorphic RBCs. In sample-level scoring, concordance with expert assessment was 100% in the Negative category (39/39; 95% CI, 91.0%-100%), 81.8% in the Moderate category (9/11; 95% CI, 48.2%-97.7%), and 78.1% in the Major category (25/32; 95% CI, 60.0%-90.7%). No validation samples were available in the Few category. Mean computational inference time was 0.033 s per image.
This YOLOv5l-based pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of rapid, morphology-aware urinary RBC classification and preliminary concordance with expert microscopy. The system may support expert-guided workflow research, but should not be interpreted as standalone diagnostic performance. Multicenter validation with independent clinical reference standards is required before clinical implementation.

PMID:
42779136
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 24 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.