Strategies for caffeine administration in preterm infants: route, dosing, monitoring, and adjunctive interventions - a systematic review.

Authors

Alaa A M Osman, Chiara Russo, Maria Rojas-Reyes, Franciszek Borys, Michelle Fiander, Roger Soll, Matteo Bruschettini, Greta Sibrecht

Published in

Italian journal of pediatrics. Volume 52. Issue 1. Sep 21, 2026. Epub Sep 21, 2026.

Abstract

Caffeine is widely used in preterm infants, yet the optimal administration strategy remains unclear. This systematic review aims to evaluate different caffeine administration approaches, including route, frequency, dose modifications, and co-administration with surfactant in preterm infants.
We searched three databases and two trial registries up to October 2024. Data collection and analysis followed Cochrane methodology; certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE; and reporting followed PRISMA.
Three RCTs were identified, two provided data for analyses: one study (38 infants) on route of administration (intravenous versus oral caffeine) and one study (40 infants) on frequency of administration (once versus twice daily). The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of intravenous versus oral administration on: mortality (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.01-2.59); mechanical ventilation duration (MD 1.00, 95% CI -8.05 to 10.05); hospital stay (MD 8.00, 95%CI -5.35-21.35); severe intraventricular hemorrhage (RR 1.00, 95%CI 0.29-3.43); and chronic lung disease (RR 5.00, 95%CI 0.26-97.70). The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of twice-daily versus once-daily caffeine on: mortality (RR 1.00, 95%CI 0.29-3.45); ventilation duration (MD 0.81, 95%CI -7.56-9.18); and hospital stay (MD -2.70, 95%CI -8.12-2.72). We found no studies on caffeine dose modifications and co-administration with surfactant. Two trials on adjusting caffeine dose and route of administration are ongoing.
Although caffeine clearly benefits preterm infants, evidence guiding optimal administration strategies, such as route, frequency, and dose modifications, is limited. High-quality studies are urgently needed to inform clinical practice and guidelines.

PMID:
42778959
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 24 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.