Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Latent profile classification of cognitive function and its influencing factors in elderly patients with chronic pain after stroke.

Created on 25 Sep 2026

Authors

Jinglei Zhou, Lei Bo

Published in

Frontiers in neuroscience. Volume 20. Pages 1940893. Epub Sep 09, 2026.

Abstract

To identify the latent profile classification of cognitive function in elderly patients with chronic pain after stroke and explore the associated factors for patients in different categories.
Elderly patients with chronic pain after stroke hospitalized in the Department of Neurology of a hospital in Nanjing from August 2025 to January 2026 were selected as research subjects. Data were collected using a General Information Questionnaire, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and Elderly Social Participation Scale. Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was used for patient classification, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for different groups (P < 0.05).
Patients' cognitive function was classified into three latent profiles: High Cognitive Function-Low Abstraction Group, Moderate Cognitive Function-Low Orientation Group, and Low Cognitive Function Group. Logistic regression analysis showed that gender, pain type, pain intensity, anxiety, and depression were significant influencing factors of cognitive function across different categories (P < 0.05).
There is significant population heterogeneity in the cognitive function of elderly patients with chronic pain after stroke. Medical staff should implement precise interventions for patients in different categories to delay cognitive decline and improve their quality of life.

PMID:
42781029
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 25 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement