Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

HER1-HER4 expression and co-expression in advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Created on 25 Sep 2026

Authors

S Coca Membribes, D M Berney, L Beltran, E Nally, F Jackson-Spence, B Szabados, S Mariathasan, T Powles, C Ackerman

Published in

ESMO open. Volume 11. Issue 9. Pages 108317. Epub Aug 05, 2026.

Abstract

The human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family is under evaluation as a therapeutic target in urothelial cancer (UC); the significance of expression patterns beyond those of HER2 is unclear.
Tumour samples from a prospective randomised phase II-III trial (NCT00949455) were analysed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and RNA profiling. Associations with molecular subtype, chemotherapy response, and overall survival (OS) were explored. The analyses were exploratory, and P values < 0.05 were considered relevant.
A total of 446 tumours were tested for HER1/HER2, 77 for HER3, and 79 for HER4 expression. HER1-HER4 were positive (IHC 1-3+) in 89%, 80%, 77%, and 75% of tumours, respectively, with high expression (IHC 3+) in 34%, 12%, 26%, and 29%. Co-expression of all four receptors occurred in 61% of tumours, with concurrent high expression in 9%. Of the tumours, 96% expressed ≥2 receptors. Luminal tumours (n = 109) showed enriched HER2 expression (93% compared with 67%, P < 0.001), and basal tumours (n = 61) showed higher enriched HER3 expression (95% compared with 77%, P = 0.02). HER1 positivity correlated with better chemotherapy responses (P = 0.02) and HER3/HER4 positivity with poorer responses (P = 0.02 and P = 0.03, respectively). No differences in OS were observed.
HER1-HER4 are broadly and concurrently expressed in advanced UC, supporting antibody-drug conjugate development beyond HER2. Receptor expression did not correlate with OS.

PMID:
42785914
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 25 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement