Active versus passive distraction for reducing venipuncture distress in preschool children: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Authors

Hui-Ming Hou, Hsian-Gyi Lee, Pei-Zhen Li, Yu-Ping Huang

Published in

Journal of pediatric nursing. Sep 24, 2026. Epub Sep 24, 2026.

Abstract

To compare the efficacy of active distraction (pinwheel blowing) versus passive distraction (cartoon watching) and usual care in reducing venipuncture-related pain, fear, and behavioral distress in preschoolers.
An open-label randomized controlled trial.
Preschoolers (N = 93) were randomized into three groups (n = 31 per group). Pain (primary outcome), fear, and behavioral distress (secondary outcomes) were assessed before and after venipuncture using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (WBFPS), Children's Fear Scale (CFS), and Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale, respectively. Analyses were conducted using intention-to-treat (ITT) and as-treated (AT) sensitivity approaches.
In the ITT analysis, only the active pinwheel group showed significant within-group reductions across all distress metrics (all p < .05). Logistic regression indicated that the pinwheel intervention significantly predicted fear improvement compared to usual care (OR = 4.84), and was superior to cartoon distraction in reducing both pain (OR = 3.09) and fear (OR = 3.56). Generalized estimating equation models revealed a significant Time × Group interaction, with distress trajectories improving exclusively in the pinwheel group. The AT analysis corroborated and strengthened these findings, with odds ratios ranging from 3.18 to 8.54 across all outcomes.
Active pinwheel distraction may be effective in reducing venipuncture-related distress compared with passive cartoon distraction and usual care, particularly when children actively engaged with the intervention.
Healthcare professionals should integrate developmentally appropriate active distraction strategies into pediatric venipuncture procedures to support atraumatic care.

PMID:
42786003
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 25 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.