Authors
Lynn Gao, Veronica Berrocal, Amanda Woodworth, Hannah R Thompson, Margaret Schneider
Published in
The Journal of school health. Volume 96. Issue 10. Pages e70246.
Abstract
School-based physical fitness testing (SB-PFT) is an important tool to address youth physical inactivity. However, the widely used Fitnessgram equation that converts timed mile run performance into estimates of cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2max) may not be valid for today's diverse US adolescent population. This study evaluated its validity, developed updated prediction equations, and examined the effect of omitting sex and/or BMI.
A diverse sample of middle school students (n = 177) provided demographic information and timed mile run data and completed lab-based VO2max testing. Prediction accuracy for the Fitnessgram equation and newly-developed equations was assessed using root mean square error (RMSE), Pearson's correlation, and sensitivity and specificity.
In this diverse sample, all four new VO2max prediction equations outperformed the Fitnessgram equation, including equations excluding sex and/or BMI.
When evaluated on a diverse sample of adolescents, the Fitnessgram misclassifies many adolescents as being in the healthy fitness zone despite having cardiorespiratory fitness levels associated with elevated health risk.
The Fitnessgram VO2max prediction equation should be updated to reflect contemporary US demographics and schools' concerns about collecting BMI data.
PMID:
42791031
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 26 Sep 2026.
Read full publication at:
Please sign in
to see all details.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 11
- Comments 0