Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Dietary Intakes of Older Retired Olympic and Commonwealth Games Athletes: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Created on 26 Sep 2026

Authors

Meredith Peddie, Jennifer Gale, Millie M Harland, Sophie Grenfell, Xaviour Walker, David Gerrard, Takiwai Russell-Camp, Hamish Osborne, Eduardo C Costa, Debra L Waters, Lara Vlietstra

Published in

Journal of nutrition in gerontology and geriatrics. Pages 1-10. Sep 25, 2026. Epub Sep 25, 2026.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe the dietary intakes of a sample of older retired New Zealand Olympics and/or Commonwealth Games athletes and compare intakes to the suggested dietary targets. Participants were recruited via the researchers' networks and by snowballing techniques. Dietary intake was estimated using three 24-h dietary recalls. Thirty-three adults (mean age 76 (8) years) who had represented New Zealand at an Olympic or Commonwealth Games between 1956 and 1990 participated. Men reported consuming 9499 (2646) kJ/day, while women were consuming 7404 (701) kJ/day. Both sexes consumed less carbohydrate, and more total and saturated fat, than recommended by the Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Ranges (AMDRs). All women, and 56% of men had calcium intakes below the estimated average requirement (EAR), while a substantial proportion of men were also at risk of inadequate magnesium (41%) and zinc (66%) intakes. Despite higher overall energy, macronutrient and micronutrient intakes than the general population of similar age, being an older retired elite athlete does not confer protection against age-related or population-wide dietary challenges. Targeted dietary interventions may be warranted to support healthy aging in this group.

PMID:
42791210
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 26 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 21
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement