Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

The effect of different endoscopic tattooing doses in laparoscopic colorectal tumor surgery.

Created on 26 Sep 2026

Authors

Ali İmran Küçük, Onur Sakalli, Bülent Toksöz, Mehmet Aziret

Published in

Medicine. Volume 105. Issue 39. Pages e50870. Sep 25, 2026.

Abstract

We aimed to demonstrate the intraoperative effectiveness of different doses of preoperative endoscopic tattooing in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgical treatment for colorectal cancer or tumors. According to the tattooing dose administered before laparoscopic surgery, patients were divided into 3 groups: Group 1, tattooing dose ≥ 1.0 cc (n = 35); Group 2, 0.5-<1.0 cc (n = 33); Group 3, <0.5 cc (n = 48). The groups were statistically compared in terms of clinical characteristics, surgical parameters, histopathological features, and ease of identification. A total of 116 patients were included in the study; the mean age was 63.8 (10.5) years, and most were male (68.1%). The rate of easy intraoperative identification during laparoscopic colorectal surgery was 88.7% (103/116). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of age, sex, body mass index, anesthesia score, tumor localization, operative time, tumor diameter, malignancy rate, neoadjuvant therapy, TNM and T stage, or number of resected lymph nodes (P > .05). Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences among the 3 groups regarding ease of identification and spillage of the dye into the peritoneum (P = .706 and P = .207, respectively). In laparoscopic colorectal tumor surgery, low-dose endoscopic tattooing provides similar outcomes in terms of ease of identification compared to high-dose tattooing. Low-dose tattooing is associated with lower cost and reduced risk of spillage into the peritoneum.

PMID:
42798110
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 26 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 14
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement