Authors
Amanda Scardini Leon Isaac, Tiago Marques Dos Santos, Gabriel Batista da Silva Leão, Thaís Silva Oliveira, Maria Angélica da Silva Ferreira, Cheryl Gouveia, Thaina Aparecida Pereira Moura Cerqueira, Jhone Inácio Silveira, Leandro Meneguelli Biondo, Louise Bach Kmetiuk, Claudia Bezerra da Silva, Bruna de Azevedo Baêta, Carla de Freitas Campos, Alexander Welker Biondo, Matheus Dias Cordeiro
Published in
Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland). Volume 15. Issue 9. Sep 19, 2026. Epub Sep 19, 2026.
Abstract
(1) Background: Although Brazilian indigenous communities of Rio de Janeiro State, southeastern Brazil, have been mostly located in conservation units and more likely exposed to ticks and tick-borne diseases, such environmental exposure remains to be fully established. Accordingly, this study aimed to detect Rickettsia spp. in ticks collected from dogs in all indigenous communities of Rio de Janeiro State. (2) Methods: After taxonomic identification, the total DNA was submitted to PCR amplification for DNA fragment (ITS-2 gene), gltA gene and the ompA gene to Rickettsia spp. identification. (3) Results: The manuscript herein surveyed seven indigenous communities, had 171 dogs examined, 26 infested, yielding 70 ticks (predominantly Amblyomma ovale, 60/70 (85.7%), with Rickettsia detected in ticks from two communities and sequencing identifying Rickettsia parkeri strain Atlantic Rainforest. Molecular analyses revealed 19/70 (27.1%) A. ovale positive to Rickettsia parkeri strain Atlantic rainforest. (4) Conclusions: The present study has reported the circulation of R. parkeri strain Atlantic rainforest in indigenous communities of Rio de Janeiro. This study also reinforces the diverse range of ticks and Rickettsia species in indigenous community areas, underscoring the necessity for ongoing and regional surveillance.
PMID:
42796759
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 26 Sep 2026.
Read full publication at:
Please sign in
to see all details.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 3
- Comments 0