Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

MSAR: multi-stage adversarial representation learning for robust financial entity-level sentiment analysis.

Created on 26 Sep 2026

Authors

Xinwen Wan, Junjie Zhao, Zheng Liang, Aoxue Shen, Wenwen Chen, Andi Xiao

Published in

Frontiers in artificial intelligence. Volume 9. Pages 1888120. Epub Sep 11, 2026.

Abstract

Financial entity-level sentiment analysis aims to identify sentiment polarity toward specific financial entities in financial texts. This task is challenging because a single sentence may contain multiple entities with opposite sentiment orientations, while financial sentiment is often conveyed through domain-specific and implicit cues, increasing the risk of entity confusion. To address these challenges, we propose MSAR, a Multi-Stage Adversarial Representation Learning framework built on a FinBERT-CRF backbone. At the textual level, a Model-Sensitive Metric generates adversarial examples by jointly considering model sensitivity, semantic consistency, and linguistic fluency. At the representation level, Adaptive Adversarial Regularization dynamically adjusts the regularization strength according to gradient sensitivity and output-distribution variation. By integrating discrete textual perturbation with continuous representation regularization, MSAR enhances robust entity-level sentiment prediction. Experiments on FinEntity and SentFin show that MSAR outperforms representative baselines. Ablation, sensitivity, and low-resource experiments further confirm the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed components. These findings demonstrate that jointly optimizing textual and representation-level robustness improves financial entity-level sentiment analysis, particularly under low-resource conditions.

PMID:
42798454
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 26 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement