Assessing Pain in Children: A Narrative Review of Distraction-Based Interventions and Outcome Measurement Tools.

Authors

Meryem Akay Kuzey

Published in

Paediatric & neonatal pain. Volume 8. Issue 4. Pages e70048. Epub Sep 26, 2026.

Abstract

Procedural pain and fear are common during pediatric immunizations and other needle-related procedures. This narrative review examined distraction-based, non-pharmacological interventions and the outcome measures used to assess pain and fear in children aged 6-12 years, with particular attention to AI-based interactive games and the Buzzy/Buzzle Bee cold-vibration device. A structured search of multiple databases identified 30 peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2024. Studies were synthesized narratively according to intervention type, pain/fear outcomes, and measurement approach. Technology-based distraction, particularly virtual reality (VR), was associated with reduced pain, fear, or anxiety across multiple studies. Cold-vibration devices also reduced procedural pain and distress, while low-cost distraction methods provided practical alternatives. Outcome measures included self-report pain scales, fear scales, behavioral measures, proxy ratings, and physiological indicators. The findings support distraction-based approaches while highlighting substantial variation in outcome measurement and the need for consistent, developmentally appropriate assessment tools. Although these interventions show promise, the studies vary widely in how pain and fear are measured. The studies included used a variety of outcome measures, including self-report pain scales, fear scales, behavioral assessment tools, proxy ratings, and physiological indicators, making direct comparisons across studies more difficult. These inconsistencies highlight the need for more standardized and developmentally appropriate outcome measures. By summarizing current evidence and identifying gaps in assessment practices, this review underscores the importance of using reliable, child-centered tools to evaluate distraction-based interventions. Integrating these evidence-based distraction strategies into routine pediatric care may help reduce procedural trauma, improve children's experiences, and support more child-centered care.

PMID:
42801019
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 27 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.