Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Species delimitation and taxonomic revision of the Rhamnella franguloides complex (Rhamnaceae).

Created on 27 Sep 2026

Authors

Qianna An, Zhiqiang Lu, Xiaolong Zhou

Published in

PhytoKeys. Volume 279. Pages 179-200. Epub Sep 18, 2026.

Abstract

Integrative species delimitation requires at least two independent lines of evidence, such as morphological and molecular data. Rhamnella franguloides (including its synonyms and the varieties inaequilatera and franguloides) and R. caudata constitute a complex with poorly defined morphological boundaries. Here, we investigated species boundaries within this complex. Consistent with previous treatments, we recognized Microrhamnus taquetii as a synonym of Euonymus alatus, rather than of R. franguloides. Population-level morphological clustering and comparison based on all available specimens, together with geographic distributions, supported the recognition of at least three distinct clusters corresponding to three species in this complex: R. franguloides, R. congesta (S.Moore) Z.Qiang Lu & X.L.Zhou, and R. caudata. In addition, the two varieties of R. franguloides are distinguished by markedly different petiole lengths. These three species and two varieties are completely or largely allopatric, and their newly defined morphological boundaries and corresponding taxonomic treatments differ substantially from those proposed previously. Sequence variation in the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region strongly supported the genetic distinction among the three species. Phylogenetic analysis based on ITS sequences indicated that the well-supported R. congesta clade was sister to another well-supported clade comprising R. franguloides and R. caudata. This study highlights the importance of integrating multiple lines of evidence in species delimitation and taxonomic revision.

PMID:
42800987
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 27 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement