Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Digital PCR for Detecting Loss of BAP1 and MTAP in Pleural Fluids of Mesothelioma Patients: Perspectives in the Diagnosis.

Created on 28 Sep 2026

Authors

Giulia Rosini, Greta Alì, Rossella Bruno, Monica Cipollini, Rudy Foddis, Alessandra Celi, Roberto Silvestri, Filomena Rea, Vittorio Aprile, Marco Lucchi, Federica Gemignani, Stefano Landi

Published in

Pathology international. Volume 76. Issue 9. Pages e70172.

Abstract

Pleural mesothelioma (PM) often presents loss of BAP1 and MTAP genes. Digital PCR (dPCR) can accurately measure gene copy numbers (CNs). We hypothesized that cell-free DNA (cfDNA) extracted from the supernatant of pleural fluids (SPFs) could allow an efficient detection of these genetic events. BAP1/MTAP CN was measured with dPCR in SPFs and in solid tumor biopsies (STBs) of 37 PM patients. Results were compared with immunohistochemistry (IHC) carried out in STBs. IHC alone detected BAP1/MTAP-losses in 32/37 (86.5%). However, the sensitivity improved to 34/37 (91.9%) when low CN of BAP1/MTAP was included. Among 20 patients presenting SPFs, dPCR alone detected a low CN in 18 samples (sensitivity = 90%). Finally, this two-gene signature was applied on SPFs in a prospective series of six consecutive patients presenting an undefined diagnosis (negative for PM) and two showed reduced CN. After 7 months of follow-up, these subjects were further re-evaluated for the persistence/worsening of the symptoms and were diagnosed for PM. We highlighted dPCR's potential for detecting subtle BAP1/MTAP losses in SPFs of PM patients. This appears as a complementary approach for a more accurate diagnosis in specific contexts, when high-risk patients receive negative results after IHC analysis.

PMID:
42801547
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 28 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement