Evaluation of 18 S rRNA as an endogenous control in OpenArray^® plasma RNA qPCR workflows.

Authors

Habib Francis, Andrzej S Januszewski, Abubakar Mangani, Fahmida K Ema, Anandwardhan A Hardikar, Mugdha V Joglekar, Michael L H Huang, David R Sullivan, Ronald C W Ma, Sanjeev Galande, Val Gebski, R John Simes, Alicia J Jenkins, Mark P Molloy, Anthony C Keech

Published in

Molecular biology reports. Volume 53. Issue 1. Sep 27, 2026. Epub Sep 27, 2026.

Abstract

Reliable qPCR analysis depends on stable endogenous controls, particularly in high-throughput pre-amplification workflows where technical bias may arise. The suitability of highly abundant 18 S rRNA as a reference gene in multiplex OpenArray^® platforms remains debated. This study evaluated the stability of 18 S rRNA, its impact on co-amplified targets, and comparability between archived and newly manufactured primer pools.
Plasma RNA from the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) trial was analysed using TaqMan OpenArray^® following reverse transcription and pre-amplification. Paired samples (n = 23) were pre-amplified with primer pools with and without 18 S rRNA and compared across four target genes. Stability of 18 S rRNA was assessed in 789 samples across 17 runs. Agreement between archived and new primer pools was evaluated in 774 paired samples using Wilcoxon signed-rank and Bland-Altman analyses.
18 S rRNA showed stable detection (median Ct 14.5, IQR 13.4-16.3) with low inter-run variability (CV 3.9%). Inclusion of 18 S rRNA during pre-amplification did not significantly alter Ct values of co-amplified targets (median differences 0.07-0.52 cycles; p > 0.05), with minimal overall bias (-0.18 Ct). Archived and newly manufactured primer pools showed a small but significant Ct shift, with lower values in the new pool (bias 0.53 Ct; p < 0.0001), although variability between paired measurements was wide.
18 S rRNA is a stable technical control in plasma OpenArray^® workflows and did not measurably bias co-amplified targets during pre-amplification. Archived and new primer pools showed only minor systematic differences and remained broadly comparable at the group level.

PMID:
42801352
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 28 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.