Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Assessment and detection of nucleotide excision repair capability in human cells: a critical review of current functional methods.

Created on 28 Sep 2026

Authors

Tianshun Xu, Yaoyang Shen, Xingyue Dai, Yixiao Shao, Yuanting Zhang, Yanru Zhang, Geng Wang, Na Li

Published in

Molecular biology reports. Volume 53. Issue 1. Sep 27, 2026. Epub Sep 27, 2026.

Abstract

DNA, as the blueprint of the cell, is continuously subjected to damage by chemicals and radiation. Such damage can lead to cell death or mutations, potentially resulting in diseases such as cancer. Fortunately, cells possess various mechanisms to repair different types of DNA damage. Nucleotide excision repair (NER) removes damaged DNA fragments and restores the original DNA sequence, thereby limiting mutagenesis and supporting genome stability. Although NER contributes to cancer prevention, its activity can be altered in a context-dependent manner in cancer cells, with increased NER capacity in some cancers potentially promoting resistance to DNA-damaging therapies. This review summarizes and compares biochemical, cellular, and genome-wide approaches for functional NER analysis, with particular attention to their measured endpoints, methodological characteristics, and interpretive limitations. The assays cover excision-product formation, repair-associated DNA synthesis, transcriptional or reporter gene-expression recovery, lesion removal inferred from restored DNA amplifiability, and genome-wide mapping of DNA damage and excision events. Because these methods interrogate distinct stages or consequences of NER, their selection and interpretation should be guided by the specific research question, with complementary readouts providing a more comprehensive assessment of NER function.

PMID:
42801347
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 28 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 12
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement