Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Bio-Based Potential of Phenolic-Rich Fabaceae Seeds (Gonocytisus angulatus, Podocytisus caramanicus): Chemical Standardization, Functional Screening, and Molecular Insights.

Created on 28 Sep 2026

Authors

Burak Bayrak, Ferhat Güneş, Beyzanur Akyüz, Elif Beyza Özer, Amenah Imad Abdulqader, Ayşe Çivaş, İsranur Küçüksu, Hatice Rümeysa Sönmez, Ömer Çeçen, Bilge Aydın, Furkan Çoban, Hafize Yuca, Songül Karakaya

Published in

Chemistry & biodiversity. Volume 23. Issue 9. Pages e71739.

Abstract

This study comparatively evaluated the phytochemical composition and bioactivities of methanolic extracts and aqueous decoctions obtained from seeds of two Fabaceae taxa (Gonocytisus angulatus, Podocytisus caramanicus). Aqueous decoction yielded higher extraction efficiencies (up to 39.20%), whereas methanolic extraction recovered a broader range of phenolic compounds. Phytochemical analysis revealed that flavonoids and phenolic acids were the dominant constituents, with chlorogenic acid, rutin, quercetin, kaempferol, and gallic acid as the major compounds, particularly enriched in methanolic extracts. In vitro assays demonstrated moderate enzyme inhibitory effects. The highest α-glucosidase inhibition was observed in the methanolic extract (20.22%), while α-amylase inhibition reached 30.11%. Anticholinesterase activity was also weak, with maximum acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) inhibition values of 15.27% and 19.93%, respectively. In contrast, antioxidant activity was more pronounced, with ABTS radical scavenging reaching 97.40%, comparable to the reference standard. Molecular docking supported these findings by indicating favorable binding interactions of major phenolic compounds with target enzymes.

PMID:
42801755
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 28 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 21
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement