Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

PET/CT-based deep learning for differentiating squamous cell carcinoma from adenocarcinoma in non-small cell lung cancer: comparison of multimodal fusion strategies.

Created on 28 Sep 2026

Authors

Gang Yan, Na Hu, Mengjuan Ran, Shuzhen Liu, Guijuan Han, Luying Xu, Rongmei Li, Qinghong Duan

Published in

Nuclear medicine communications. Sep 24, 2026. Epub Sep 24, 2026.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT)-based deep learning for differentiating squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) from adenocarcinoma (ADC) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to compare single-modality and multimodal fusion strategies.
This retrospective study included 220 patients with pathologically confirmed NSCLC (86 SqCC and 134 ADC) who underwent pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT. A 2.5D input strategy used the axial tumor slice with the largest mask area and its two adjacent slices. Four models were developed: PET-only, CT-only, PET/CT dual-branch fusion, and PET/CT six-channel early fusion. Performance was evaluated using five-fold stratified cross-validation with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, balanced accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC).
The PET-only model achieved higher mean AUC and MCC than the CT-only model. The PET/CT six-channel early fusion model achieved the highest mean AUC (0.766 ± 0.082), balanced accuracy (0.765 ± 0.071), specificity (0.882 ± 0.093), and MCC (0.530 ± 0.132). The dual-branch fusion model achieved the highest mean sensitivity (0.755 ± 0.144), although its mean AUC was lower than that of the PET-only model.
PET/CT six-channel early fusion showed potential for differentiating ADC from SqCC and may provide complementary information for noninvasive histological assessment. External validation is required before clinical application.

PMID:
42802911
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 28 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement