Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Multiterritory Bihemispheric Ischemic Stroke in the Setting of Unilateral Internal Carotid Artery Disease.

Created on 28 Sep 2026

Authors

Kalina Misiolek, Amna Sohail

Published in

Cureus. Volume 18. Issue 8. Pages e115353. Epub Aug 28, 2026.

Abstract

Accurate determination of stroke mechanism is essential for secondary stroke prevention. Bilateral, multiterritory ischemic infarcts are commonly attributed to a central embolic source, prompting evaluation for cardioembolism, paradoxical embolism, or hypercoagulable states. However, this diagnostic approach assumes conventional intracranial vascular anatomy despite the high prevalence of Circle of Willis variants. We report the case of a 66-year-old man who presented with acute bilateral cortical and subcortical ischemic infarcts involving the right middle cerebral artery (MCA), right anterior cerebral artery (ACA), and left ACA territories. Although transthoracic echocardiography identified a patent foramen ovale (PFO), digital subtraction angiography (DSA) demonstrated a hypoplastic left A1 segment with the left ACA supplied by the right internal carotid artery (ICA) through a patent anterior communicating artery (ACom). This vascular configuration provided a plausible pathway by which artery-to-artery emboli arising from the ulcerated right proximal cervical ICA plaque could reach both hemispheres. The collective clinical and imaging findings supported the right ICA plaque as the most likely culprit source, prompting carotid endarterectomy. This case highlights the importance of incorporating individualized cerebrovascular anatomy into stroke mechanism determination and secondary stroke prevention.

PMID:
42802830
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 28 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement