Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

The influence of anaesthesia levels monitored by Narcotrend on haemodynamics and postoperative cognitive function of elderly patients.

Created on 28 Sep 2026

Authors

Ruina Guo, Xueli Zhao, Xizhong Ma, Jianghong Liu, Zhixun Hu

Published in

Annals of agricultural and environmental medicine : AAEM. Volume 33. Issue 3. Pages 353-358. Sep 21, 2026. Epub Apr 03, 2026.

Abstract

The aim of the study is to determine the appropriate level of anaesthesia for elderly patients when using Narcotrend for maintaining anaesthesia during surgery.
A total of 135 elderly patients with intestinal tumours were randomly divided into 3 groups: A, B and C (during the surgery, the anaesthesia levels were maintained at D0, D2, and E1, respectively). Heart rate (HR) and Mean arterial pressure (MAP) were monitored at the following time points: T1 - before anaesthesia, T2 - before intubation, T3 - after intubation, T4 - during surgery, T5 - at the end of surgery, and T6 - at extubation. Additionally, cognitive function was evaluated through MMSE scores before and after the surgery.
Compared with T1, group A showed a significant acceleration in HR at T3, T5 and T6. However, no significant fluctuations in HR were observed in Group B and Group C. Furthermore, in T2 and T4, the MAP of all groups decreased, and the change was most significant in group C. After the surgery, the MMSE scores of Group B and Group C were higher. However, compared with group C, the dosage of anaesthetic drugs in group B was lower and the extubation time was shorter.
Compared with D0, maintaining the anaesthesia level at D2 or E1 may be able to reduce the risk of postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients. Furthermore, compared to E1, the D2 level is more likely to maintain haemodynamic stability.

PMID:
42802955
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 28 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 12
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement