Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

The impact of RET fusions on radioiodine avidity and prognosis in patients with distant metastatic papillary thyroid cancer.

Created on 29 Sep 2026

Authors

Kexin Shi, Xinyue Zhang, Shuhui Huang, Tian Tian, Rui Huang

Published in

Endocrine. Volume 91. Issue 1. Sep 28, 2026. Epub Sep 28, 2026.

Abstract

RET gene fusion is one of the key oncogenic drivers in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). However, the impact of different RET fusion subtypes on clinicopathological features and radioiodine (RAI) avidity in metastatic PTC remains unclear.
We retrospectively analyzed clinicopathological data, RAI avidity, and progression-free survival (PFS) in RET-driven metastatic PTC. Initial RAI avidity status was classified as initially RAI-avid (all or partial lesions showing uptake in the first therapy) or initially RAI-non-avid (all lesions with no uptake in the first therapy). The definition of RAI refractory (RAIR) was based on the 2025 ATA guidelines.
Among 65 enrolled patients, 25 (38.5%) harbored CCDC6-RET, 24 (36.9%) NCOA4-RET, and 16 (24.6%) other RET fusions. Older age was associated with the other RET fusion group (P = 0.011). NCOA4-RET patients were more likely to be initially RAI-avid (P = 0.017). Overall, 46.8% (29/62) of evaluable patients were classified as RAIR (CCDC6: 56.0%, NCOA4: 27.3%, other RET fusions: 60.0%; P = 0.072). TERT promoter mutation (18.2%, 8/44) in RET-fusion PTC was associated with older age (P < 0.001), larger metastatic lesions (P = 0.012) and metastatic sites beyond lungs (P = 0.002). RAIA patients demonstrated a longer median PFS compared with RAIR patients (86 vs. 33 months), but this association was not statistically significant (P = 0.402).
In this metastatic RET-driven PTC cohort, 46.8% of evaluable patients eventually develop RAIR status. While the specific RET subtypes are associated with initial RAI avidity status, no significant differences in RAIR status or PFS were observed across distinct RET subtypes, warranting further exploration in larger sample sizes.

PMID:
42804115
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 29 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement