Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Optimizing ovarian stimulation in oocyte donation: exploratory comparison of rhFSH (2:1) versus hp-hMG under PPOS protocols.

Created on 29 Sep 2026

Authors

Pamela Villanueva, Silvia Ortiz, Paula Ricra, Camila Carlos, Fiorella Castillo-Velásquez, Luis Noriega- Portella, Luis Noriega-Hoces, Luis Guzmán

Published in

JBRA assisted reproduction. Sep 28, 2026. Epub Sep 28, 2026.

Abstract

To describe embryological outcomes in oocyte donors undergoing progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) with either recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (rhFSH): recombinant human luteinizing hormone (rhLH) (2:1) or highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (hp-hMG).
Young, healthy donors began PPOS on cycle day 2 and were sequentially allocated into an observational case series study. Donors receive either rhFSH:rhLH (2:1) or hp-hMG (both at 225IU/day; n=26 and n=10 donor cycles, respectively). Final oocyte maturation was triggered with triptorelin 0.2 mg. Retrieved oocytes were fertilized by ICSI, and embryos were cultured to the blastocyst stage and graded. A subset of blastocysts underwent PGT-A biopsy prior to vitrification. The oocyte retrieval team and embryologists were blinded to treatment allocation.
Baseline donor characteristics were similar. Donor cycles allocated to rhFSH:rhLH showed numerically higher oocyte yield, metaphase II oocytes, 2PN fertilization, and total blastocyst formation. The mean number of good-morphology blastocysts per cycle was approximately two-fold higher with rhFSH:rhLH (4.5 vs. 2.0). Following an interim descriptive review of the first ten hp-hMG cases showing suboptimal embryological outcomes, further allocation to hp-hMG was discontinued as a programmatic decision. No inferential statistical testing was performed, consistent with the exploratory case series.
In this exploratory case series, rhFSH:rhLH within PPOS demonstrated more favorable laboratory outcomes. These results generate hypotheses and support the need for further studies to confirm the observations and determine their clinical relevance in oocyte donation programs.

PMID:
42804682
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 29 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement