DLD voices: Setting the research agenda for developmental language disorder in Australia.

Authors

Robert Paul Wells, Yina Liu, Emily D'Arcy, Natalee Blakemore, Nicky Ferreira, DLD Voices Advisory Committee, Suze Leitão, Elizabeth Hill

Published in

International journal of speech-language pathology. Pages 1-12. Sep 28, 2026. Epub Sep 28, 2026.

Abstract

Developmental language disorder is associated with adverse social, academic, and mental health outcomes. The developmental language disorder community are the end-point consumers of research, as such, their input into research priorities is invaluable. We took a bottom-up approach to identify and prioritise the research needs of consumers with lived experience of developmental language disorder, their families, and supporters.
This study employed Q methodology to systematically and inclusively identify and sort participants' research priorities. Anonymous interest-holders (n = 82) were recruited to develop a Q-set of research priorities. Research statements were refined from this Q-set by the consumer advisory group who also drew on findings of a literature review. Finally, results from a nationally distributed Q-sort (n = 35) were analysed within each participant group (lived experience and professionals) using Q-Method software.
Two main viewpoints on future developmental language disorder research priorities in Australia were identified: 'Environmental support and enabling participation' and 'Building the evidence-base'.
Community and professional interest-holders prioritise research for developmental language disorder which focuses on building communicative environments of people who have developmental language disorder and enriching the evidence-base for accurate diagnosis and effective interventions. This work informs the future research agenda for developmental language disorder in Australia and internationally.

PMID:
42804360
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 29 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.