Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Assessing the Lagged Regional Economic Output Gaps After the 2015 South India Flood.

Created on 29 Sep 2026

Authors

Kehan He, Priti Parikh, Zhifu Mi

Published in

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis. Volume 46. Issue 10. Pages e70365.

Abstract

Natural hazards can adversely impact society, environment, and human well-being. The development of mitigation strategies is typically based on estimates of economic losses, but such estimates are difficult when high-resolution post-disaster data are scarce. Models such as the input-output model have traditionally served as tools for disaster footprint analysis, although their reliance on equilibrium assumptions and limited treatment of production-capacity adjustment can constrain their application to short-run natural-hazard impacts. This study applies a dynamic sequential interindustry model (DSIM), combining recent developments in dynamic input-output analysis with regression-based coefficient estimation, to examine conditional temporal output gaps after the 2015 South India Flood. Using monthly industrial production indicators and a two-region aggregation of the 2015 Indian MRIO table, we investigate aggregate economic propagation between Tamil Nadu and the broader Indian economy. The results should be interpreted as model-implied, conditional scenario estimates rather than independently validated measurements of the full economic cost of the flood. Under these assumptions, the estimated national output gap is approximately 1.6 times the highest available direct-damage estimate, suggesting that aggregate interregional spillovers may be policy-relevant even when only limited post-disaster data are available.

PMID:
42805924
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 29 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement