Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Mechanism-based reporting patterns of infection-related adverse events with systemic psoriasis therapies in FAERS.

Created on 29 Sep 2026

Authors

Shinwon Hwang, Yerim Kwak, Yeon Woo Jung, Se Yong Jung, Jae Il Shin, Tae-Gyun Kim

Published in

The Journal of dermatological treatment. Volume 37. Issue 1. Pages 2727193. Epub Sep 29, 2026.

Abstract

Infection-related adverse events are an important safety concern in psoriasis therapy.
To compare infection-related adverse-event reporting across mechanism-based therapy groups.
We analyzed psoriasis-indicated US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) reports from 2014 Q3 through 2025 Q3. Sixteen therapies were grouped as TNF, IL-12/23, IL-17, and IL-23 inhibitors and immunosuppressive or non-immunosuppressive nonbiologics. Primary exposure was a primary- or secondary-suspect listing; sensitivity analysis required drug-sequence linkage to psoriatic disease. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) and information-component lower bounds (IC025) were calculated.
Among 357,728 reports, 67,827 contained an infection term. Signals were strongest for immunosuppressive nonbiologics (ROR 2.51; IC025 0.88) and IL-12/23 inhibition (2.43; 0.83), followed by IL-17 inhibitors (1.82; 0.47). TNF inhibitors showed a modest signal (1.17; 0.11), whereas IL-23 inhibitors were near null (0.99; -0.04). Indication linkage attenuated the immunosuppressive-nonbiologic signal to ROR 1.14 (IC025 0.09), while IL-12/23 and IL-17 signals persisted. IL-17 inhibitors showed a Candida signal (ROR 8.67; IC025 1.55).
Reporting estimates varied by mechanism, and exposure attribution materially influenced the immunosuppressive-nonbiologic result.

PMID:
42806931
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 29 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement