Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Quantitative Assessment of Pupillary Dysfunction in Acute Internal Carotid Artery Dissection.

Authors

Filippo Farina, Claudio Baracchini

Published in

Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging. Volume 36. Issue 5. Pages e70149.

Abstract

Diagnosing internal carotid artery dissection (ICAD) can be challenging even for experienced clinicians, as one of its most specific signs-Horner syndrome (HS)-is often missed during routine neurological examination (NE). This study aimed to evaluate pupillary reactivity in ICAD patients using ultrasound pupillometry (UP) and compare quantitative UP findings with standard NE.
We enrolled 33 consecutive patients with acute ICAD and an age- and sex-matched healthy control group without ocular pathology. HS was assessed at admission using standard NE. UP was performed in both the affected eye (AE) and non-affected eye (NAE), measuring pupillary diameter (PD) and response time (PT) to light stimulus (LS) and ciliospinal reflex (CR). Ultrasound examinations were performed by a single operator, while all offline quantitative measurements were performed by a second investigator blinded to the neurological findings.
UP revealed significantly smaller PDs in the AE compared with the NAE, both at rest and after direct and consensual LS (3.23 ± 0.64 mm vs. 5.12 ± 0.51 mm, p < 0.01). The AE also showed reduced CR response in terms of mydriasis (4.03 ± 2.8% vs. 9.76 ± 3.36%, p < 0.01) and dilation time (2.984 ± 0.278 s vs. 2.071 ± 0.223 s, p < 0.01). Similar differences were observed between the AE and controls. Quantitative pupillary abnormalities were identified by UP in 96.9% of patients, whereas clinical HS was detected by standard NE in 39.4% (p < 0.01).
UP represents a promising Neuro-POCUS application for the objective, quantitative assessment of pupillary dysfunction in acute ICAD and may serve as a valuable adjunct to routine NE.

PMID:
42806924
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 29 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.