Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Multiple Accessory Pathways in Children: Electrophysiological Features and Catheter Ablation Outcomes.

Created on 29 Sep 2026

Authors

Emine Gülşah Torun, Nevin Özdemiroğlu, Asiye Yıldız, Zeynep Ömeroğulları, Muhammed Ali Ekşi, Serhat Koca

Published in

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE. Sep 28, 2026. Epub Sep 28, 2026.

Abstract

Multiple accessory pathways (MAPs) may complicate electrophysiological assessment and catheter ablation in pediatric patients. We aimed to evaluate the clinical and electrophysiological characteristics, anatomical distribution, and procedural and follow-up outcomes of pediatric patients with MAPs.
This retrospective study included pediatric patients with at least two distinct accessory pathways identified during EPS between November 2019 and February 2026.
Of 1101 patients who underwent catheter ablation, 619 had accessory pathway-related arrhythmias; among these, 31 (5.0%) had MAPs. The mean age and body weight at the first procedure were 12.1 ± 3.6 years and 44.2 ± 18.8 kg, respectively, and 16 patients were female. Nine patients had structural heart disease, including seven with Ebstein anomaly. A total of 66 accessory pathways were identified: 28 patients had two pathways, two had three, and one had four. The right posteroseptal region was the most common pathway location (27.3%). One patient also had atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Complete elimination of all accessory pathways was achieved in 29 of 31 patients (93.5%), and 63 of 66 pathways (95.5%) were successfully ablated. Recurrence occurred in six patients (19.4%). No procedure-related complications were observed during a mean follow-up of 26.3 ± 18.7 months.
MAPs were successfully treated with high acute success rates and no procedure-related complications. Nevertheless, recurrence and the identification of additional accessory pathways during subsequent evaluations remained clinically relevant, supporting the need for systematic post-ablation reassessment and long-term follow-up.

PMID:
42806460
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 29 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 13
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement