Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Empathy and Theory of Mind Abilities Among Help-Seeking Adolescents with Different Cyberbullying Roles.

Created on 30 Sep 2026

Authors

Nazan Gundogan Kucuksahin, Buket Belendir Esen, Gizem Keser, Berkin Akbaydar, Ekin Sut, Sevay Alsen Guney

Published in

Clinical child psychology and psychiatry. Pages 13591045261494398. Sep 29, 2026. Epub Sep 29, 2026.

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aimed to examine empathy and Theory of Mind (ToM) abilities among adolescents involved in cyberbullying and to identify the risk factors associated with different involvement roles.MethodsA total of 244 adolescents were categorized into four groups based on the Revised Cyberbullying Inventory-II: cyberbully-victims (CBV, n = 110), pure cybervictims (CV, n = 53), pure cyberbullies (CB, n = 20), and non-involved controls (C, n = 61). ToM was assessed using the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) and the Hinting Test (HT), while empathy was measured with the KA-SI Empathic Tendency Scale. Clinical evaluations were conducted using the K-SADS-5.ResultsThe CBV group showed significantly lower HT and affective empathy scores, along with higher rates of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), compared to the control group. No significant differences were observed in RMET scores between groups. Logistic regression analyses indicated that higher affective empathy and HT scores reduced the risk of cyberbullying involvement, whereas an MDD diagnosis was a significant risk factor for both CBV and CB groups.ConclusionsUnderstanding distinct profiles regarding ToM and empathy may inform targeted prevention and intervention strategies against cyberbullying. Additionally, integrating mental health assessments may further enhance the effectiveness of existing programs.

PMID:
42809578
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 13
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement