What to do with K-wires in displaced upper extremity fractures in children - where to bury or not.

Authors

Andreas Frodl, Marietta Borbely, Nikos Karvouniaris, Nils Mühlenfeld, Markus Siegel, Kerstin Kuminack, Carlotta Pietsch, Ferdinand C Wagner, Benjamin Erdle, Hagen Schmal

Published in

European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society. Volume 52. Issue 1. Sep 29, 2026. Epub Sep 29, 2026.

Abstract

Kirschner wires (K-wires) are the standard fixation method for displaced pediatric upper extremity fractures, yet no consensus exists on whether wire ends should be buried subcutaneously or left exposed epicutaneously. While epicutaneous K-wires offer cost-effectiveness and avoid second anesthesia, concerns remain regarding infection risk and psychological distress. To systematically review and compare complication rates between buried and exposed K-wire fixation in pediatric upper extremity fractures, including infection, refracture, skin erosion, and secondary implant displacement. We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, searching Cochrane, PubMed, EmBase, and Ovid databases. Inclusion criteria were: modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS) > 60, upper extremity fractures treated with K-wire fixation, and age < 16 years. Studies including adult patients and biomechanical studies were excluded. Meta-analysis compared outcomes across 12 studies encompassing 1,977 patients. Buried K-wires demonstrated significantly lower overall infection rates (OR = 1.74; 95% CI: 1.19-2.56; p = 0.004). However, no significant difference was observed in deep surgical siteinfections (OR = 1.56; 95% CI: 0.60-4.0; p = 0.36). Exposed wires showed significantly lower skin irritation rates (OR = 0.09; 95% CI: 0.04-0.21; p < 0.00001). No significant differences were found in secondary implant displacement (OR = 1.26; 95% CI: 0.10-15.75; p = 0.86) or refracture rates (OR = 1.90; 95% CI: 0.91-3.96; p = 0.09). Geographic subgroup analysis revealed significant regional differences: infection rate differences were significant in Asia/Africa (OR = 2.90; 95% CI: 1.61-5.22; p = 0.0004) but not in Europe/USA (OR = 1.16; 95% CI: 0.69-1.95; p = 0.57). Epicutaneous K-wire fixation shows higher overall infection rates than buried wires but does not increase deep surgical site infections requiring operative revision. Considering the avoidance of additional anesthesia, favorable cost-benefit profile, and geographic variation in infection risk, epicutaneous K-wires are recommended when no patient-specific contraindications exist, particularly in temperate climates. Level III (Systematic Review of Level II-III Studies).

PMID:
42809107
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.