No evidence for rational adaptation during verb-argument processing in aphasia.

Authors

Evelyn Milburn, Michael Walsh Dickey, Rebecca Hayes, Tessa C Warren

Published in

Cognitive neuropsychology. Pages 1-27. Sep 29, 2026. Epub Sep 29, 2026.

Abstract

Rational adaptation (RA) theories argue that people differ in how heavily they rely on knowledge about language versus event likelihood when they understand sentences depending on which type of knowledge is more reliable for them. Findings from multiple paradigms hint that, in language tasks, people with aphasia (PWA) rely more on world knowledge than neurologically healthy controls do. We tested rational adaptation theories in PWA using a visual world eye-tracking study of sentence comprehension. Both PWA and healthy controls showed similarly strong influences of world knowledge and verb constraints, with a slight delay in PWA, contrary to predictions of RA theories. Additionally, PWA showed more interference from a semantically-related distractor. These findings together do not provide clear evidence in favour of RA theories' predictions, but are consistent with models suggesting that impaired control mechanisms may play a role in language processing deficits in aphasia.

PMID:
42809676
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.