Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Urinary pH and Checkpoint Inhibitor Outcomes in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: An Exploratory Brief Report.

Created on 30 Sep 2026

Authors

Satoshi Yamamoto, Manabu Kanasugi, Tomoki Shirafuji, Hiroki Bamba, Sanji Kanaoka, Kazuyoshi Nakamura

Published in

Urologia internationalis. Pages 1. Sep 29, 2026. Epub Sep 29, 2026.

Abstract

Urinary pH is a low-cost host-related marker, but its association with immune checkpoint inhibitor outcomes in advanced urothelial carcinoma is uncertain.
We retrospectively reviewed 45 consecutive patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who received pembrolizumab or avelumab and had urinary pH measured at treatment initiation. Baseline urinary pH was categorized as ≥6.5 or <6.5. Outcomes were objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Cox models were adjusted for Bellmunt risk score. Early urinary pH dynamics were examined when available.
Baseline urinary pH was ≥6.5 in 20 patients and <6.5 in 25. Objective response rate was 40.0% versus 16.0%, respectively. Baseline urinary pH ≥6.5 was associated with longer progression-free survival after Bellmunt adjustment (hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.86), whereas the association with overall survival was weaker. Among 32 patients with early urinary pH data, objective response rate was 41.7% in the High-High group, 28.6% in the Low-High group, and 0% in the Low-Low group. In a pembrolizumab-only sensitivity cohort, the direction of association with real-world progression-free survival was preserved but attenuated.
Urinary pH showed an exploratory association with checkpoint inhibitor outcomes. Because urinary pH is influenced by renal function, infection, medication, hydration, and diet, it should be interpreted as a hypothesis-generating host-related signal rather than a direct surrogate of tumor acidity.

PMID:
42809532
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 18
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement