Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Using genomic surveillance to detect related Guiana Extended-Spectrum (GES) β-lactamase-producing Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) cases in a clinical setting.

Created on 30 Sep 2026

Authors

Sandeep K Bhaurla, Emily B Fox, Jehan Mephors, Kezia Coster, Alba Montes, Karen Nguyen, Kathryn Siemers, Kelsey OYong, David Jensen, Zachary Rubin, Jacob M Garrigues, Nicole M Green

Published in

American journal of infection control. Sep 29, 2026. Epub Sep 29, 2026.

Abstract

Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) cause difficult-to-treat infections and can be transmitted in healthcare facilities. CRPA containing Guiana Extended-Spectrum (GES) genes are rare in Los Angeles County and undetectable using commonly used assays. This report describes the detection and transmission of GES-CRPA in a long-term acute care hospital (LTACH).
Epidemiological investigations and environmental samplings were performed to identify and control a potential source of transmission. Microbiological isolation techniques and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) were used to recover blaGES isolates and determine relatedness.
Genomic surveillance identified three related clinical cases of GES-CRPA over a three-year span. Environmental sampling of sinks and sink drains identified related GES-CRPA isolates. These isolates were found to contain an uncommon combination of antimicrobial resistance genes present in a class 1 integron. Infection control measures intended to prevent transmission from sinks and adjacent surfaces were implemented.
This work highlights the importance of combining traditional epidemiology and genomic surveillance to detect outbreaks that may have otherwise gone unnoticed, enabling rapid outbreak management.

PMID:
42810451
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 25
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement