Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A meta-analysis of the effects of combined interventions centered on cognitive training on cognition, executive function, and negative emotions in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Created on 30 Sep 2026

Authors

Xingjun Zhou, Yuanye Hu, Zixuan Yang

Published in

Frontiers in neurology. Volume 17. Pages 1883995. Epub Sep 15, 2026.

Abstract

To systematically compare the effects of five intervention strategies centered on Cognitive Training (CT), including Routine Care (RC), CT, Physical Exercise (PE), Cognitive Plus Exercise Training (CET), and Cognitive Plus Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (CNIBS), on cognitive function, executive function, and negative emotions in patients with Alzheimer's disease, using a network meta-analysis. The relative efficacy of different interventions was ranked to provide evidence-based support for optimizing combined treatment strategies in clinical practice.
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EBSCO databases were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials on CT and its combined interventions for Alzheimer's disease published from database inception to April 2026. A network meta-analysis was conducted within a frequentist framework using Stata 17.0 software. The efficacy of interventions was ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve.
A total of 19 randomized controlled trials involving more than 2,000 patients were included. The network meta-analysis showed that, for cognitive function, CNIBS (SUCRA = 75.4%) and CET (SUCRA = 72.4%) ranked first and second, respectively, and were significantly superior to RC and single interventions. For executive function, CET ranked highest (SUCRA = 99.9%) and was significantly superior to PE alone (SMD = 3.71, 95% CI: 3.16 to 4.26) and RC (SMD = 1.69, 95% CI: 0.48 to 2.91), other interventions do not offer a significant advantage over RC. For negative emotions, CET ranked highest (SUCRA = 83.7%), followed by PE alone (SUCRA = 57.9%), and CNIBS was also superior to CT alone (SMD = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.61).
Combined interventions centered on CT are superior to single interventions in improving multidimensional symptoms in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Among them, CET shows the most prominent advantages in improving executive function and negative emotions, whereas CNIBS shows the greatest effect on overall cognitive function. In clinical practice, individualized intervention strategies should be selected according to the primary rehabilitation goal.

PMID:
42812254
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 15
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement