Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Substantial evidence against sex differences in bed nucleus of the stria terminalis volume in the human brain.

Created on 30 Sep 2026

Authors

Sam C Berry, Harsimran K Suri, Matteo Lisi, James P Ravenhill, John P Aggleton, Carl J Hodgetts

Published in

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology. Jul 29, 2026. Epub Jul 29, 2026.

Abstract

'The bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) is a sexually dimorphic basal forebrain region' is a claim prevalent across rodent and human neuroscience research, arising from the observation that it is substantially larger in male versus female brains. Despite the pervasiveness of this claim, which may have implications for understanding sex differences in anxiety and substance use disorders, inspection of prior literature reveals a complex and nuanced picture. Research on volumetric human BNST sex differences comes from a handful of mostly small-scale post-mortem studies and two MRI studies, between them reporting no, moderate, or very large differences. This indicates the need for a more detailed systematic investigation. Addressing this, we developed a novel 3T T1-weighted (T1w) manual segmentation protocol for the BNST, which was applied to sub-millimetre resolution T1w structural MRI data in 170 young human adults. Using a Bayesian modelling approach, taking into account existing data and accounting for total brain volume, age, and sibship, we find substantial evidence favouring no sex difference in total BNST volume. We recommend that researchers exercise caution when reporting evidence of BNST sexual dimorphism, particularly when translating findings from rodent models in which the BNST may play a different, olfaction-focused, role.

PMID:
42812208
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement