Two-to-one randomization is associated with increased control-arm patient withdrawal.

Authors

Boris Freidlin, Edward L Korn

Published in

Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Sep 30, 2026. Epub Sep 30, 2026.

Abstract

Patient withdrawal from a randomized clinical trial before starting the study treatment complicates the interpretation of the trial results, especially if a larger proportion patients withdraw from the control-treatment arm than the experimental-treatment arm. This may happen in an open-label trial if the patients are disappointed with their treatment assignment. It has been hypothesized that two-to-one randomization may lead to more disappointment withdrawals. To investigate this, we examined a cohort of 396 published oncology trials from four journals (2022-2025) to assess the differential pre-treatment withdrawal rates. We found that in 35 open-label trials with two-to-one randomization patients were, on average, 3.72 times more likely to withdraw on the control-treatment arm (95% CI = 2.66 to 5.22). This is a larger relative risk than was seen in the 181 open-label trials with one-to-one randomization, 1.99 (95% CI = 1.67 to 2.37). To avoid differential withdrawal, trials should be blinded when possible.

PMID:
42813972
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.